You’ll Never Catch Up with AI. That’s Not the Point.

Forget the hype. Overcome the FOMO. Start building what matters.

Remember when we used to joke about a new JavaScript framework dropping every week?

AI saw that and said, “Hold my transformer.”

Now we get new models, research papers, AI-assisted coding tools, and agentic systems—every week. By the time you grasp one, three more show up, and yesterday’s favorite is already deprecated.

So you open another tab, skim another newsletter, and save another tweet thread for later. You tell yourself, “I’ll start once I catch up.”

But you never do.

Because in AI, catching up isn’t a milestone. It’s an illusion.

Let’s talk about how to actually make progress.

The Never-Ending AI Hype Loop

We’ve seen this cycle before in tech. Frontend developers know it well.

A new framework launches. It’s faster, smaller, and more elegant than anything before. Tech social media lights up. Blog posts declare it the future. Everyone piles in.

Then reality sets in. The docs are vague, the edge cases break, and actual teams hesitate to adopt it in production.

The hype fades, replaced by the next big thing. And the cycle repeats.

AI follows the same loop now, only it moves faster:

1. The drop: A new model or tool launches. Everyone calls it a game-changer.

2. The hype: Threads, tutorials, and hot takes flood your feed.

3. The stall: You try it, get stuck, and move on.

4. The chase: Something else drops. You jump again.

Eventually, you’re drowning in bookmarks but haven’t shipped a thing.

At some point, you have to ask yourself: What are you actually learning by jumping tool to tool?

In many cases, the answer was nothing that sticks.

The Readiness Trap

You’re not stuck. You’re stalling.

You want to learn AI engineering the right way. Not hacks or shortcuts but real foundations: models, prompt (or context) engineering, RAG, evals and workflow automation. So you start collecting. A course here. A repo there. A bookmarked talk. A long explainer.

The list grows. So does the pressure to feel “ready.”

But learning isn’t the problem. It’s the waiting. You’re caught in what Ira Glass calls the taste–skill gap: your eye for quality grows faster than your ability to create. So you delay. You prepare. But never quite start.

Meanwhile, people shipping half-baked AI hacks are learning faster. They ship. Break things. Fix them. Improve. You’re still curating resources.

Are you stuck in pre-work?

• You’ve watched more AI talks than you’ve written lines of code.

• Your “AI” folder has subfolders named To Read and Read Soon.

• You compare tools by features you’ve never actually tried.

• You feel behind but couldn’t name a single problem you’re trying to solve.

If two or more landed, you’re in the trap.

The way out? Pick something small and real and let the work pull the learning.

Fundamentals Over FOMO

The more you scramble to keep up, the less you actually learn.

When you’re chasing every shiny new model, tool, or framework, you’re not deepening your skill. You’re skimming. And in fast-moving fields like AI, shallow learning is indistinguishable from none at all.

There’s a name for this: the information-action ratio. Coined by media theorist Neil Postman, it describes the widening gap between what we learn and what we actually apply. Most AI content today widens that gap. We consume more than we apply, so our sense of progress becomes distorted.

Chip Huyen, author of AI Engineering, calls it out clearly: “The more we want to not miss out on things, the more things we will miss.” That’s the FOMO paradox. When you chase every shiny new model or framework, you stay shallow.

Instead of chasing the latest trend, choose fundamentals: learn how LLMs work, how retrieval-augmented generation helps, when to fine-tune, how to build an MCP server, and how to build agents. These concepts are not going away next week. They’ll still matter next year.

And solving the problem is still more important than picking the coolest tool. Many teams build AI wrappers that feel clever but solve nothing. Skip the tech flex. Go for clarity.

You don’t have to know everything. Just enough to solve something real.

Momentum Over Mastery

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: the fastest learners in AI aren’t the smartest. They’re the ones who ship.

They don’t wait to master prompt engineering before building a bot. They build the bot, watch it break, and then learn what they actually needed. That’s the cheat code: learn just in time, not just in case.

There’s even science behind this. Behavioral economists call it the IKEA effect: we place more value on what we build ourselves, even if it’s clumsy or imperfect. That ugly script you cobble together will teach you more than a dozen tutorials. And you’ll care more about it simply because you made it.

Real learning begins when your bot breaks in the wild. That’s feedback, not failure.

While others worry about falling behind, you’re moving. And movement beats mastery every time.

Not sure where to start? Try one of these micro-wins:

• Build a GPT that summarizes meeting notes.

• Use an LLM to extract structured data from messy email threads.

• Add autocomplete to a form everyone hates.

• Spin up a tiny agent that knows only your internal docs.

You don’t need a thesis project. You need a feedback loop.

Final Thoughts

You’re not falling behind. You’re stuck in a system built to make you feel that way.

AI moves fast, but your job isn’t to chase it. It’s adopting it.

The people who learn fastest aren’t the ones who read the most. They’re the ones who try, fail, and adjust. Every ugly script that breaks teaches you more than another unread tutorial.

You don’t need to catch up. You need to start.

Pick a problem. Build something tiny. Let it break.
And if you’ve already started? Keep going.
You’re ahead of more people than you think.

Stop hoarding. Start shipping.

---

Thanks for reading The Engineering Leader. 🙏

If you enjoyed this issue, tap the ❤️, share it with someone who'd appreciate it, and subscribe to stay in the loop for future editions.

👋 Let’s keep in touch. Connect with me on LinkedIn.